Popular Posts

Powered By Blogger

Popular Posts

Popular Posts

Powered By Blogger

Total Pageviews

Popular Posts

Popular Posts

Translate

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Why India, Pak rang in I - day with no clue about borders

In his report in The Times of India of 14 August 2026, Jayanta Kalita delves into the Archives of TOI and narrates the events that led to the birth of India and Pakistan.. The post overlaps with relevant inputs from the internet  as well as personal inferences

Why India, Pak rang in I - day with no clue about borders

If there ever was a man unfit to undertake an exercise of humongous proportions and significance - drawing a line through 175000 square miles (453247 sq km) of land, determine the fate of millions of people and carve two sovereign nations out of British India - it was none other than the British lawyer, Cyril Radcliffe.

On a sweltering afternoon in July 1947, the 48 year old British barrister stepped off a plane at Delhi's Willingdon airfield (now Safdarjung airport). He had never been to India before. He spoke none of its languages. He had no training in cartography. He had little understanding of the intricate, centuries old social and cultural landscape he was about to redraw.

He was mandated to divide colonial India into two nations. The exercise split communities, set off one of history's largest and bloodiest mass migrations and left territorial disputes that haunt South Asia to this day.

Radcliffe drew the partition map in secrecy. He relied on outdated census data, flawed maps and an ink pen for the surgical strike. He masked his incompetence through working  behind the  shuttered windows of a secluded bungalow on the grounds of the viceroy's estate - now Rashtrapati Bhavan. 

Even as the British Empire was making a hurried retreat - it was desperate to leave India before a civil war erupted on its watch -  the Partition was sealed under the June 3 plan, spearheaded by Lord Mountbatten, the last viceroy of British India. The plan established two Boundary Commissions - one for Punjab in the west and another for Bengal in the east - both chaired by Radcliffe.

Their mandate appeared deceptively simple. Draw the boundaries of the two new dominions along areas where Muslims and non - Muslims formed contiguous majorities. But Radcliffe had found himself wedged between the fiercely competing political demands of  Indian National Congress and  Muslim League along with the irreconcilable claims over territory put forth by them  and the unforgiving deadline of Mountbatten - August 15, 1947. 

Radcliffe never visited the border lands he was tasked to divide. He was reportedly wary that his presence could fuel panic among communities already living through a hypercharged and highly volatile political crisis.

Mountbatten's Ploy and a Million Deaths

Radcliffe finally submitted his boundary reports on August 12. Making a calculated decision, Mountbatten locked the maps in a safe and suppressed the announcement. India and Pakistan declared independence on August 15 and 14, respectively without knowing where their international borders actually lay.

Like much of the country, villagers in Punjab's Gurdaspur and Bengal's Nadia and  Dinajpur raised the Tricolour on August 15, 1947, believing they were finally living in an independent India. Days later, many discovered that a new boundary line had placed their homes and villages in a different country.

It was only on August 17, two days after the British flags were lowered and the victory parades concluded, that the Radcliffe line was publicly revealed.   

The result was chaos. The confusion was profound

Families woke up to discover that their fields belonged to one country and their homes belonged to another. 

Police stations, courts and revenue offices suddenly found themselves on the wrong side of the divide. Entire pockets were left without a functioning administration. In the vacuum, panic spread quickly, followed by violence. Within days, an estimated 15 million people had fled across the borders.

Mission over, Radcliffe left India on August 18, 1947 - just a day after his boundaries were published. 

Horrified by the violence that followed, in which around one million people are estimated to have died, he burned his field notes. He refused his 3000 Pounds Sterling fee and vowed never to return to the subcontinent.

World War One was one of the deadliest conflicts in the history of the human race, in which over 16 million people died.

World War II was the largest and most violent military conflict in human history.. 70 million to 85 million people had died during World War II. This total includes roughly 21 million to 25 million military deaths and 45 million to 55 million civilian deaths, driven by combat, genocide, famine, and disease. 

A cavalier approach  means  a careless, dismissive or overly casual attitude toward serious matters, important rules or other people's feelings. It shows a lack of proper concern and a tendency to ignore potential risks or consequences. 

No doubt, Radcliffe's approach was cavalier. He proclaimed it loudly with his deeds. He was the perfect fit for the British who hated the Indians for driving them out of India. Retribution is what the British longed for. They had, for almost two centuries, lorded it over India with their 'divide and rule policy'. They left India after dividing it into two nations, that were to remain, perpetually at loggerheads. It suited their interests, especially business interests. It suited the interests of the Arm Merchants who invented the first World War. With the carrot of independence dangled by the British, the Indians unwittingly fell for the trap. India that had been one for centuries together was carved into two. Later the two became three with the inception of Bangladesh. Imagine what a super power India would have been if the British had been unsuccessful in dividing the great nation.

Radcliffe awarded the Muslim majority tehsils of Gurdaspur district to India. It was bitterly protested by Pakistan. The decision gave India its only vital land corridor with the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.

The Chittagong hill tracts, a region with a predominantly indigenous Buddhist population with ethnic ties with India's Northeast was awarded to East Pakistan to secure the hinterland for the Chittagong Port, creating long term ethnic displacement in the area.

The worst was the validation of the centuries old land gambling stakes, between the Kingdom of Cooch Bihar and the Mughal empire in the east, by the Radcliffe line in Bengal. Local legend had implied that the complex system of border enclaves between Cooch Bihar and Mughal territories (or Rangpur) originated from chess or dice games where regional rulers wagered local villages and pockets of land as stakes.  The result was a bewildering constellation of enclaves - 111 patches of Indian territory inside East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and 51from the the other side inside India.

For the seven decades that ensued, tens of thousands of residents in these enclaves lived as virtual non citizens They were unable to access basics like electricity, healthcare or state protection.

For any job you need a person who is well versed on the demands of the job. If he doesn't know anything about it he is trained well and then is placed on the hot seat. It enables him to perform well. Radcliffe might have been a very good and clever barrister. But he didn't know any thing about the onerous task he was assigned. It is like placing one who doesn't know driving on the driving seat or placing someone with no idea of accounting as the accountant of a reputed Institution. He would blindly affix his signature on all the documents presented  before him - exactly what the people who put him there desperately needed. Radcliffe was merely a signing machine. He happily did that and had sent one million to their deaths.   He  cannot absolve himself from the senseless act that displaced15 million people who never knew what had hit them

Cyril Radcliffe did exactly what the British desired. 

With his cruel intervention, he finished India, the great country, for good.

 


HAZARDS

 


The Video on Kezia Liz Mejo winning Miss India Universe 2026 was forwarded to a close friend, a Pastor.  His Church has a universal presence.   

A few lines were inserted.l

"Incredible 

India Miss Universe

Her mother hails from Kadammanitta - the Kalleli MarThoma Church. 

The family is in Abu Dhabi.

Ann's elder sister Vinaya and her mother were contemporaries as they grew up.

Ann is our daughter in law

Look at what one can achieve even if you are from a village sans the paraphernalia of a major city or a developed locality.

You can, if you believe"

He responded:

"I am too happy with every achievement...

But remember Rachel Gupta & Milla Magee too."

(The inference was, they had relinquished the crowns they won due to circumstances they disfavoured)

I replied:

"Hazards. 

Remember the Church has been confronted with hazards for years together.

Like the prophets we cry out, "Oh! God. Don't you see this?" "Where are you?" "Why do you remain silent?"  "Are you still there?" "Don't you have concern for your people?" "Why do you let the evil doers enjoy a free run?"

" It seems the answer is at the conclusion  of 'Tess of the D'Urbervilles' by Thomas Hardy.

" We could see something like, "Mortals are mere playthings for the Gods."

But we don't have to give up.

History tells us evil never reigns forever.

KERALAM THROUGH THE EYES OF A GREAT VISIONARY


An official of the Indian Railwys voices his views on Kerala and its rail requirement.

 Kerala functions almost like one linear urban and economic region, with substantial intercity movement

A dedicated largely elevated high speed rail corridor designed to minimise land acquisition and environmental disruption would be the most practical model


If only the administration listens to this great visionary........



Monday, August 24, 2026

Shri. P. Kunhalikutty states negativism has been the bane of Kerala

  


According to a statement by Shri. P. Kunhalikutty, the Honourable Minister for Industries and Information Technology, Government of Kerala, negativism has been the bane of the State.

Negativism anywhere by anybody is bad. In the Keralam context almost all here, are adept in weighing the pros and cons. 

Here the cons almost always outweigh the pros. 

Kuzhapamilla is our beacon. Pessimism is the guiding angel. Optimism is taboo. 

Once you cross the borders of Keralam the attitude shifts. 

Let me quote a superb example. There was Tamilian GM in the Kerala Office of a Pan India organization. Naturally, his office was staffed solely by Malayalees. One day this GM asked a simple question. "What is wrong with you Malayalee people. When you put up something to me for the final decision, you are all outlining the negatives first and then you follow it up with the positives. What I am asking is, why can't you put the positives first and the negatives, second. Why can't you reverse the order?" 

The implication is plain. Come whatever may, we are not interested in a positive outcome. 

As it is, we have an assured income - through salaries, wages, freebies, nokkucooly or anything else. We won't let anything scuttle it. 

We don't care if progress is stifled. 

We have to be safe. 

It is heard John Hopkins went straight to Singapore, when our people objected to their campus at Mattuppetty. If it is true, John Hopkins did not lose. 

Who lost is a mute question. 

For the people who matter Mayo Clinic is there. The state meets the expenses. 

For the rest it is apna, apna. 

Guess what happens to the people who don't matter, the haves and the have nots here. 

They have the wonderful opportunity to bid au revoir fast from this world of torments, torture, paucity and manipulations



FORMATION OF MUVATTUPUZHA DISTRICT

 

The Honourable Chief Minister of Kerala rently declared that the Government is contemplating the formation of Muvattupuzha District. 

It has been long overdue.

At present the areas upto Neriamangalam comes under Ernakulam District, we believe.

The area is vast. Exercising proper control over such a huge landmass is humanly impossible. Naturally the development of the area has suffered over the years. It remains backward.

Ernakulam district minus the proposed Muvattupuzh District has more than enough on hand. It has the Eloor Industrial area, Nedumbasserry Airport, Cochin Port, Infopark, Kochi Metro and a host of developmental initiative. Ernakulam District with its prent size is bursting at the seams. It certainly is unwieldy.

It is indeed good, the formation of Muvattupuzha District is being contemplated.

Coupled along with that Tiruvalla needs to be separated from Pathanamthitta District. If Kuttanadu and Chengannur are added to it to form another district it would work wonders  for the comprehensive development of the area. 

As it is Kuttanadu and Chenagnnur are parts of Alapuzha District. It is a very difficult trek for the people of Kuttanadu and Chenganuur to reach Alapuzha. But their proximity to Tiruvalla makes it easier for the people to access the District Head Quarters to approach the authorities for their needs. In the present juncture it is a herculean task for the administration at Alapuzha to look after the far way Kuttanadu and Chengannur. The consequence has been the backwardness of the area.

Tiruvalla at present is the most developed place in Kerala. Its needs are complex. It is imperative, it is carved out of Pathanamthitta. The district with its hilly tracts  has much more than it can chew.  

WHERE NECESSITY ENDS AND INDULGENCE BEGINS

 Excerpts from 'Politicians Paid More For Less Work' by Prabhu Chawla in the New Sunday Express of 23.08.2026

Aristotle believed that the strength of a republic ultimately rested on the character of those who governed it. 

Montesquieu warned that political power, left unchecked, had a natural tendency to expand beyond proper limits.

Edmund Burke, while defending the independence of elected representatives, reminded them that they owed their electors not merely their jobs but their judgement.

Nearly two and a half centuries after Burke, India's democracy has arrived at a rather different question. How much should the people have to pay for those who exercise power in their name?

John Locke believed that the purpose of government was to preserve the rights  of those who entrusted it with power. Burke saw representative government as a solemn understanding between the elected and the elector. 

Neither imagined that democracy would one day acquire the institutional paraphernalia of a corporate establishment, with its own hierarchy of salaries,allowances, vehicles, houses and privileges.

It is the truth that a facility meant to enable public service can easily become a perk which, once granted, has a remarkable tendency to become an entitlement. The citizen is meanwhile expected to accept that public expenditure must be restrained, subsidies must be rationalised and government departments must economise. The contrast is becoming increasingly difficult to defend.

Governments change, parties change and political rhetoric changes, yet once power is acquired, the political class appears to rediscover a common fraternity. Better cars,better houses, better salaries and better facilities for those who occupy legislatures. The citizen is perpetually reminded of fiscal prudence and the legislator, rather more often, of what the public purse can provide.

The real issue is whether the compensation attached to public office bears any relationship to the responsibilities discharged by those who receive it. 

The paradox is that the political class has become more expensive while the legislature itself has become less deliberative. 

State assemblies have, on an average, been meeting only for a fraction of an year. But when legislative time diminishes while political privileges expand, the citizen is entitled to ask whether the two trends can coexist. 

However there is an irony. The Indian voter is perhaps the most unforgiving auditor of political performance. Sitting legislators are routinely defeated. Anti-incumbency remains one of the most powerful weapon in Indian electoral politics. Yet the citizen has no effective mechanism to demand an account of what happens with the deployment of public funds. What is urgently needed is the establishment of  a credible compact between privilege and performance.

The danger that looms large is that political privilege will gradually become normalised across segements until nobody remebers to ask where necessity ends and indulgence begins. The language of public service can then become a convenient vocabulary for private comfort, while the tax payer is left to finance an increasingly elborate architecture of poiwer. 

Democracy cannot be adjudged by how generously it treats those who govern. It must ultimately be judged by how responsibly those who govern treat the money, institutions and the trust placed in their hands.

While going through the entire article, it was felt parallels could be drawn with the happenings in a Church for the past couple of years. It is left to the viewers to discern.

 

Sunday, August 23, 2026

VISALAM - MADURAI - GOPALKRISHNA GANDHI

 GOPALKRISHNA GANDHI 

'Visalam' is a small street side Cafe in Madurai where you can have the best kaapi that can be had at a predawn hour.

T.Sadasivam, MS Subbulakshmi's husband had once told Gopalkrishna Gandhi,                          "If there is one place where you can get steaming, soft idlis and fresh hot kaapi even at 4 in the morning, it is Madurai."

Excerpts from Kumbakonam Via London, With Stopover in Madurai                                    in The New Sunday Express of 23.08.2026 by Gopalkrishna Gandhi